Bess Kargman does a very good job
developing the backstories of each of the characters, and therefore creating an
interesting plot for viewers to follow. The viewer has a better understanding
of each character during the competition after learning about their lives in detail.
The costumes are, of course, very nice ballet costumes, and the narration
really adds to the movie’s effect. All of the films shots are very nice, and
there are a variety of different shots. There are many extreme close-ups of the
dancers’ feet on pointe. Instead of just having the one wide shot of the dancer
from the audience, there are close-ups and medium close-ups during performances
to grasp the viewer’s attention. It must have been very difficult to get these
close-ups, and they are all of very high quality. There are no special effects,
which is good in my opinion because I think that they would tae away from the documentary.
They would reduce the viewers understanding that everything in the film is
real, and that these people are living the lives described in the documentary.
This documentary was well done and kept my interest, even though it is 90
minutes long. Rotten Tomatoes gave the film a 96%, and IMDB gave it a 7/10.
Showing posts with label movie reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movie reviews. Show all posts
First Position Analysis/Review
500 Days of Summer
Writer Anthony O. Scott, from the New York Times, seems pleasantly surprised by 500 Days of Summer's creatively organized plot. He starts off by giving his opinion of the movie, as well as the movie's theme that love can be confusing, and can fail in the end, but still be a good experience. Most of the review focuses on summarizing the plot of the movie, although Scott does spend some time discussing the actors and the cinematography. He likes Zooey Deschanel and Joseph Gordon-Levitt together, but wishes that Marc Webb had developed the character Summer in to a complete character. Scott felt that her character lacked depth.
For our quarterly movie review, I think that we should only have a basic structure to follow, allowing some freedom as far as organization goes. We could just be required to discuss the three aspects of film, giving us the chance to decide what to write about based on what we find important during the film. I also don't think that the reviews should be too long, as most movie goers want a short, concise review to read, not an essay.
For our quarterly movie review, I think that we should only have a basic structure to follow, allowing some freedom as far as organization goes. We could just be required to discuss the three aspects of film, giving us the chance to decide what to write about based on what we find important during the film. I also don't think that the reviews should be too long, as most movie goers want a short, concise review to read, not an essay.
